Apple defeated Samsung. Chronicle of the verdict of the court

04.12.2014

Apple defeated Samsung. Chronicle of the verdict of the court

Apple defeated Samsung. Chronicle of the verdict of the court

Apple defeated Samsung. Chronicle of the verdict of the court

the Jury court San Jose, considering the resonance Apple’s case against Samsung, unexpectedly announced officially to make your verdict. After hearing the arguments of both parties, which lasted three weeks, the jury of seven men and two women decided on the conclusion that irrevocably tilted the scales in favor of Apple.

Experts noticed right before the meeting: the court too quickly determined conclusions. This could mean that the verdict will be extremely hard for one of the parties. Samsung rushed to require an additional 30 minutes after the verdict was announced to double-check it for errors. The atmosphere was tense to the limit — dead silence-dilutable a furious clatter of keys laptop invited journalists. And then entered the hall judge Lucy Koh.

She asked the jury to acquaint her with 20-page verdict after it is announced. After all, any, even the slightest error in it may be grounds for reconsideration of the case. Apple has decided to accede to the request of Samsung and read the text. All perfectly understood: in the case of delay, the road back will be gone. After several minutes, the verdict appeared in text form on the judge’s table. And then came the jury — stone faces — and in turn introduced themselves.

— the Jury is ready to render a verdict?

— Yes.

Apple’s claims against Samsung

Samsung illegally used the ideas from the patent Apple /381 devices: Continuum, Droid Charge, Exhibit 4G, Galaxy Ace, Prevail, S 4G, Galaxy S II, Galaxy Tab, The Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerie, Nexus S 4G, Replenish, Vibrant, Captivate, Galaxy Tab Wifi .

Samsung illegally used the ideas from the patent Apple /915 devices: Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Fascinate, Galaxy Prevail, Galaxy S 4G, Galaxy S II, i9100, Galaxy SII T-Mobile, Tab, Tab 10.1, Gem, Indulge, Infuse, Nexus S 4G, Galaxy Tab 10.1. The charge does not apply Ace, Intercept and Replenish .

Samsung illegally used the ideas from the patent Apple /163 devices: Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Exhibit 4G, Fascinate, Ace, Prevail, Galaxy X, Galaxy S 4g, S II AT&T, i9100, Galaxy SII T-Mobile, Galaxy Tab, Tab 10.1, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Replenish, Fascinate, Galaxy Tab 10.1. The charge does not apply Captivate, Continuum, Gem, Indulge, Intercept, Nexus S 4G, Transform and Vibrant .

Encourage motive installed in all cases of violations of the patent Apple /381 for all of the aforementioned devices. 381 — this is the same patent scrolling .

Samsung illegally used the ideas from the patent Apple /677 devices: Fascinate, Galaxy S, Galaxy S 4G, Galaxy SII ATT, Galaxy SII i9100, Galaxy SII Tmobile Galaxy SII Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, Showcase, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, Vibrant. The charge does not apply Ace .

Samsung illegally used the ideas from the patent Apple /087 devices:Galaxy S i9000, Galaxy S 4G, Vibrant. The charge does not apply Galaxy SII ATT, Galaxy SII i9100, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, Infuse 4G .

Samsung illegally used the ideas from the patent Apple /305 devices: Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Fascinate, Galaxy S i9000, S 4G, Showcase, Gem, Indulge, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant.

Samsung has not used any of the ideas from the patent Apple /889 none of their devices.

the most Important question: intentionally do acted Samsung, using the ideas of the Apple patents?

Patent /677: Yes. Device: Fascinate, Galaxy S 4G, Galaxy SII ATT Galaxy SII Tmobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket, Showcase, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant. For each case Samsung will be obliged to pay a fine at least.

Patent /087: Yes in: Galaxy S 4G, Vibrant. No: Galaxy SII ATT Galaxy SII Epic 4G Touch, Galaxy SII Skyrocket, Infuse 4G.

Patent /305: Yes in: Captivate, Continuum, Showcase, Gem, Indugle, Infuse 4G, Mesmerize, and Vibrant.

Samsung failed to prove failure of any of the presented Apple’s patents.

Samsung «blur» corporate identity iPhone 3G, releasing similar products:Fascinate, Galaxy S i9000, Galaxy S 4G, Showcase, Mesmerize, Vibrant. the Charges do not relate to Captivate, Continuum, Droid Charge, Epic 4G, Prevail, Galaxy SII ATT, Galaxy SII i9100, Galaxy SII T-Mobile, Epic 4G Touch, Skyrocket and Infuse 4G .

Samsung did not «blurred» brand style iPad. A great victory of the Korean people.

Loss Apple suffered from the actions of Samsung:

1 billion, 51 million 855 thousand$.

Loss Apple incurred from Samsung devices:

Prevail. 57 million dollars.

Infused 4G: $ 45 million.

Mesmerize. 53 million dollars.

Accusations against Samsung Apple

article Summary: Apple defeated Samsung. Chronicle of the announcement of the verdict the iphone, ipad, apple, iPhone, iPad, iPad, samsung

Source:
Apple defeated Samsung. Chronicle of the verdict of the court

Також ви можете прочитати